A POLICE watchdog will not investigate an incident which saw a Thames Valley officer run down a stray cow in May.
The force referred itself to the Independent Office of Police Conduct following the killing of the cow, which was unable to be contained after it had escaped in Woodley.
But the IOPC will not investigate the matter, which caused uproar online and led to a vigil for the animal.
Absolutely disgusting behaviour by @ThamesVP in the way you dealt with the whole incident. Why did you not call in a professional to help herd the cow to safety rather than attempting to do it yourselves. You then took it upon yourself to run over the poor animal numerous times!
— Emma Schmidt (@emmajschmidt) May 14, 2021
A spokesperson for the watchdog said: “After carrying out a thorough assessment we determined that the information provided by Thames Valley Police did not meet the criteria for a referral to us and therefore the matter has been sent back to the force.”
READ MORE: Shocking footage of police officer mowing down a cow
Thames Valley Police has been contacted for comment.
‘No complaints’
An investigation by the Chronicle found that Thames Valley Police recorded ‘no formal complaints’ related to the incident in the fallout from the controversy.
A Freedom of Information request sent to the force revealed that “complaints had been made by members of the public in relation to this incident, however none of them were eligible to complain formally, therefore no formal complaints were recorded.”
READ MORE: Police explain why officer hit cow with car
TVP did not respond to a request for comment explaining why no formal complaints had been recorded.
Hope you treat these animals better than the cow your officers mowed down deliberately. It is an offence to cause unnecessary suffering to any animal as I'm sure you well know, who decided this would be an appropriate action, and will they be facing repercussions for their crime?
— 🏳️🌈 Rebecca 𓃹 ⎊ #BLM (@Beccaasauruss) May 14, 2021
And according to the force, the incident was not recorded as a crime despite some residents claiming they had reported it as such.
'Best judgement'
In May, Matthew Barber revealed the force had referred itself to the IOPC following the incident.
Following the watchdog’s decision not to investigate the matter, he reaffirmed his support for the actions taken by officers that night.
READ MORE: Animal rights group calls for action after cow hit by police
Speaking to the Chronicle, he said: “I reviewed the actions of officers in conversations with the Chief Constable and the senior officer commanding the incident, and as per the statement I put out, I was content that officers acted using their best judgement in the interests of public safety and having considered reasonable alternatives.”
Decision 'not taken lightly' on night of incident
A cow escaped from a field in Woodley on the evening of Thursday, May 13.
In a statement posted after the incident, police said several attempts were made to bring the cow under control when it escaped last month.
But officers were unable to do this and the animal moved to a residential area.
READ MORE: Thames Valley Police refers itself to police watchdog following 'cowgate'
"It became increasingly distressed and charged at a member of the public causing her minor injury, as well as causing injuries to a TVP officer and damage to vehicles”, the statement read.
Please see below a statement regarding an incident that took place last night, involving a cow on the A329M in Wokingham 👇 pic.twitter.com/19MOnpkong
— Thames Valley Police (@ThamesVP) May 14, 2021
“Despite efforts of both the police and the farmer to whom the animal belonged, the cow could not be safely brought under control.
“Officers subsequently used a police vehicle to stop the cow and prevent it from charging towards other members of the public.
READ MORE: Banksy-esque street art imitating cow being hit by police car appears in Woodley
“After all other options including tranquilisation were precluded, the cow was humanely euthanised at the scene by a private company.
“This decision, whilst not taken lightly, was necessary to limit the suffering of the animal, to prevent further injury and to ensure the safety of the public.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel