A campaign group that has spent years fighting to preserve green space in Tilehurst is “not confident” that a 265-home development can be stopped.
U+I Pincents Lane Ltd’s plans to build on land just off Pincents Lane have proved to be extremely controversial, as more than 2,100 objections have been lodged since 2019.
But there are hundreds of supporters who say they are being priced out of Tilehurst and welcome this project because it will provide 106 affordable homes.
READ MORE: Families priced out of Tilehurst back 265-home project
The company has also promised to provide £1 million for infrastructure, create a 22 acre public park and plant enough trees to form a 20-metre wide ‘woodland buffer’ between Tilehurst and the new housing estate.
But the Save Pincents Hill Group, said people “really value” the “last open green space in Tilehurst” and it is full of wildlife.
Campaigners are concerned about losing that green space and say the development will put a huge strain on local schools, GP surgeries, roads and other infrastructure.
A decision is due to be made by West Berkshire Council at the end of April and the group believe the planning application will probably be approved.
They said “the only thing that may save us” is a report from the council’s Highways Development Control Team Leader.
In the report, he raised concerns about queues and journey times on Pincents Lane being “even longer” near IKEA and Sainsbury’s if 265 homes are built in Tilehurst.
A spokeswoman for the group said: “People don’t care about what type of houses will be built, they just don’t want them to be built there.
“I think people really value the open space for its peace and quiet and once it’s gone, it’s gone forever.”
She added: “There have been five planning applications for that hill and three appeals that have been turned down.
“People have been fighting to protect the hill for years. It’s a threat people have been living with since the 1980s.”
READ MORE: Decision on plans for 265 new Tilehurst homes delayed
The campaign group also claims this project contravenes a West Berkshire Council planning policy which states new homes should “primarily” be built on “previously developed land within settlement boundaries”.
U+I director Jonny Anstead said: “Local people do care about what kind of homes can be provided here and many local people have urged us to provide homes that they, or their children, can afford.
“That’s why we are offering 40 per cent of homes as being either social rent or shared ownership.
“Local residents have told us that housing in Tilehurst is scarce and too expensive.
“We’ve spoken with adults from their 20s and even into their 50s who are living with their parents, because the high cost of local housing prevents them from affording a place of their own.
“They don’t want to move out of the area and leave behind their friends and family. Members of the police, school and NHS staff have told us they are priced out of the area.
“It’s right that these people, and others, should be able to have their own home in their local area.”
He added: “What we’re proposing will add enormously to the level of public green, open space in the local area, by opening up 22 acres of the site as a new public park that will be owned and managed locally and protected from any future development.
“This is an important, and potentially one-off opportunity to secure a key new green space for local residents to use legally, and on a permanent basis.
“Our plans are sustainable with at least a 35 per cent saving on operational carbon emissions compared to conventional development.
“In addition, our site is well-placed for sustainable travel to local jobs in Reading, Tilehurst and elsewhere in West Berkshire.
“These are some of the reasons hundreds of local residents we spoke with during our consultation supported our proposals for Pincents Lane.
“We continue to work constructively with West Berkshire officers to address all remaining issues to ensure we bring forward a scheme that will be of real benefit to the local area.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel